Legal Opinion

McOsker v. Burrell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by appellee, against appellant, for obstructing an ancient watercourse and diverting the course of the water, which obstruction and diversion caused an overflow of appellee’s land, to his damage, etc.

The acts done are thus charged in the complaint:

“ The plaintiff avers that the said defendant, without any right or authority from the plaintiff, or by lawful right or authority, did, on or about the 20th day of May, 1871, order, and ever since that, time has maintained, a dam across the original channel of said creek, of logs, plank and earth, and thereby, and by digging a ditch, then and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BlaisdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hymes v. AydelottIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Trustees of the Wabash & Erie Canal v. SpearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Carter v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Patoka Township v. HopkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Walburn v. GoughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Black v. LinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cauble v. HultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API