Legal Opinion
Jones v. Bernanke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 2008No. Civil Action No. 04-1696 (RMU)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; Finding as Moot the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts III & IV
I. INTRODUCTION
The only claim left standing in this legal tug-of-war is the plaintiffs retaliation claim based on a 2000 performance evaluation the plaintiff received while employed at the Federal Reserve. Despite the court’s previous denial of its motion for summary judgment regarding this claim, the defendant, the Federal Reserve, requests that the court now revisit and extinguish the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Jones v. BernankeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- HILFIGER v. AlgerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.