Legal Opinion

Prince v. Ark. State Highway Comm'n

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 6, 2019No. : CV-18-616Published

1ConcurrenceKaren R. Baker, Justice

I agree with the majority's disposition; however, I write separately for the reasons stated in my dissents in Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas v. Andrews , 2018 Ark. 12, 535 S.W.3d 616 and Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n v. Hurd , 2018 Ark. 397, 564 S.W.3d 248. While I concur, I must note the majority's footnote- Andrews has no bearing on a citizen's right to bring an illegal-exaction claim-is not supported by Andrews and its progeny. The majority's footnote states:

We further note that the decision in Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas v. Andrews , 2018 Ark. 12, 535 S.W.3d 616,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS v. MATTHEW ANDREWSSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Arkansas Tech University v. LinkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. MacKey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Born v. Hosto & Buchan, PLLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Farrell v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API