Legal Opinion

Harvey v. AB Electrolux

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided March 28, 2014No. C11-3036-MWBPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.

[[Image here]]

Plaintiffs have brought claims on behalf of hourly employees at defendants’ former laundry appliances plant in Webster City, Iowa. Plaintiffs claim that defendants’ failure to compensate them for the time they spent donning personal protective equipment (“PPE”), walking to their work stations after donning their PPE, and washing their gloves and arm guards at home violates the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. and the Iowa Wage…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Serv., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Leonardo Cardenas Guzman v. Warden of California City Detention Facility, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. McWashington v. Nordstrom Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  4. Pedro Aguirre, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  5. Reyes v. WolfDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API