Legal Opinion
McWashington v. Nordstrom Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 23, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01230Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 CURTIS McWASHINGTON; EDWARD M. MESHURIS; EMILY SANCHEZ; JAMES 8 ALBRIGHT; and CORY R. CROUCHLEY, individually as participants in the Nordstrom 9 401(k) Plan and as representatives of all persons similarly situated, 10 Plaintiffs, C24-1230 TSZ 11 v. ORDER 12 NORDSTROM, INC.; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORDSTROM, INC.; and 13 NORDSTROM 401K PLAN RETIREMENT COMMITTEE, 14 Defendants. 15 16 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss, docket no. 30, 17 brought by defendants Nordstrom, Inc. (“Nordstrom”),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.