Legal Opinion

Petrie v. Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 27, 1997No. C-97-0927 MHPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Phillip H. and Judith E. Petrie (“Petries”) originally filed this action in San Francisco County Superior Court based on various breach of contract claims against defendant Pacific Stock Exchange (“Exchange”). 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sections 1441 and 1446, the Exchange filed a notice of removal, premised solely on federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). In its notice of removal, the Exchange asserted that federal question jurisdiction existed under section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act (“Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, because the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API