Legal Opinion

Smith v. Monarch Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Elizabeth W. Pine, J.

Defendant insurer moves, pursuant to CPLR 325 (subd [b]), for the removal to this court of a small claims action now pending in Rochester City Court.

In early 1976, plaintiff applied for health and accident coverage from defendant. A policy issued in March, 1976, effective April 1, 1976. Plaintiff submitted a claim for benefits under the policy in July, 1977. In November, 1977, defendant *1060denied plaintiffs claim on the ground of alleged material misrepresentations.

In November of 1977, based upon defendant’s denial of his application for benefits,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woolston v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1969
  2. Cetrola v. John Hancock InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  3. Dermody v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Monarch Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Duvergee, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API