Legal Opinion

Deignan v. Lubarsky

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action to recover for the death1 of the plaintiff’s intestate, an employee of the defendant; the latter was not insured under the workmen’s compensation act. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and comes here on numerous exceptions taken by the defendant during the trial. But in the view that we take of the case, the only exception that we need consider is that arising from the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

The following is a summary of the significant evidence: The plaintiff’s intestate on September 30, 1941, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Kralik v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Kelly v. Hathaway Bakeries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Dunsmoor v. CowdreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Burke v. ToothakerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. Falvey v. HamelburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Shaw v. Boston American League Baseball Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Sellew v. Tuttle's Millinery Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API