MacHock v. Fink
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
1 1 In this case, we consider a provision of the Utah Trust Deed Act ("UTDA") that gives a creditor three months to file a deficiency action after foreclosure of a trust deed. Respondent Joseph Machock made a loan to John Harmer that was secured by a junior trust deed to Harmer's home. Petitioner Carl Fink guaranteed payment on the loan. When Harmer defaulted, Machock sued Fink on the guaranty, later foreclosed the trust deed, then continued to pursue Fink for the amount due without filing a deficiency action. We must determine whether Machoek's breach-of-guaranty…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Martin v. HickenlooperUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Salt Lake County v. Metro West Ready Mix, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- City Consumer Services, Inc. v. PetersUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Mitchell v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- DiMeo v. Nupetco Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- The Home Abstract and Title Co. v. American Pension Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Iron Head Construction, Inc. v. GurneyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.