United States v. Kroop
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVERETT, Senior Judge:
The Judge Advocate General certified this case to test whether the Air Force Court of Military Review erred in setting *471aside parts of the findings entered by the military judge on Kroop’s pleas of guilty to three specifications alleging unbecoming conduct, in violation of Article 133 Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 933. See 34 MJ 628, 633-36 (1992). In light of the allegations in the three specifications, we hold that the Court of Military Review reached a correct result.
A
Lieutenant Colonel Kroop, a married Air Force officer who commanded the base civil…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. JohannsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. KroopU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. PeszynskiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. ConwayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. RogersUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. MarcyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.