Legal Opinion

McOwen v. Grossman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 2007No. B190681PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

Appellant Kevin McOwen filed a medical malpractice action on March 25, 2004, against Caremore Medical Group, Peggy Salazar (not parties to this appeal) and a number of Doe defendants. On August 8, 2005, appellant amended his complaint by substituting respondent Marc Grossman, M.D., for one of the Does. The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that, as to respondent, the statute of limitations barred the action. We conclude that the trial court erred in ruling that the statute of limitations bars the action and reverse the judgment.

FACTS

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Woo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Dieckmann v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Estate of O'Connor v. O'Connor, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Straley v. GambleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Estate of O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Garst v. Tehama County Flood Control & Wat. Conservation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2026

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API