Legal Opinion

Brazelton v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1943No. 30667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Omitting nonessential statement of details of pleading, intervention, and the adding of parties, this cause came to issue between creditors of one Sautbine, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, and Sautbine and others, hereinafter referred to as defendants.

The several tracts or items of real estate involved were shown by the records to belong to relatives and friends of Sautbine, but were wholly managed and controlled by him.

Plaintiffs contended that the property, although standing of record as the property of others, was in truth and in fact the property of Sautbine, and subject to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. White v. Exchange Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Caldwell v. Indian Terr. Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Barnsdall v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corporation v. George W. Jones and Bess A. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Haynes v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Dungey v. DowdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API