Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant bank from a verdict and judgment against it and in favor of the plaintiff, whose evidence reasonably tended to prove the following facts: On March fi, 1925, the bank was in possession of a promissory note executed by Louis Hamburger, in the sum of $1,150 and payable to the order of R. Neeley. Neither the petition nor the evidence indicates whether the bank was holding the note as owner thereof, as agent for its sale, or for some other purpose. On, that date it sold the note to plaintiff fon the sum of $1,150, and plaintiff gave the bank his check for that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Farmers' State Bank of Ada v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Clover v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Phelps, Dodge and Palmer Co. v. Halsell and FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grider v. USX Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Morris v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Vogel v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Andres v. McNeil Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.