Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coviello

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant was convicted under G. L. c. 269, § 14A, as appearing in St. 1965, c. 521, of using the telephone repeatedly for the sole purpose of harassing, annoying or molesting one Hanley or his family. He presents for our consideration his exception to the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress “records of intercepted communications” which were obtained without a warrant.

At the hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress, it was established that a so called pen register or pen register device had been used by the telephone company to obtain certain information which would be used at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Benanti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. District Attorney for the Plymouth District v. CoffeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. District Attorney for Norfolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. John T. Martin v. Rudolph H. DesilvaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API