Legal Opinion

District Attorney for the Plymouth District v. Coffey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 12, 1982PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The defendant was charged with three violations of G. L. c. 269, § 14A. The complaints alleged that he used the telephone repeatedly for the sole purpose of harassing, annoying, or molesting Elaine Coffey, his former wife. A judge of a District Court, after a hearing, allowed the defendant’s motion to suppress “[a]ny portions of the contents of any interception or any evidence derived therefrom as a result of the use of a pen register or similar device pertaining to the telephone number of the defendant’s residence.” The Commonwealth appealed the allowance of that motion. We transferred the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. MahnkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. AngiuloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Gilday v. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. CoteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BrandweinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API