Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Dakin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit upon a note.

Answer that the note was given for a certain tract of land; that the plaintiff fraudulently represented that he had the fee simple title to the land, while, in fact, the fee simple title was in one Hiesler. Eeply in denial. Trial. Judgment for the plaintiff. •

A new trial was moved for upon this single ground, that the Court had not jurisdiction, because the title to real estate was in issue.

The Court overruled the motion; and the question whether the title to real estate was put in issue by the pleadings is the only one before us. • The evidence is not in the record.

It is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. PerdueIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Coleman v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Fleetwood v. Dorsey Machine Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Barber v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API