Legal Opinion

Crum and Forster Personal Insurance Co. v. Travelers Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1993No. 4113PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this declaratory judgment action to determine an issue of coverage, we are asked to interpret a policy provision which excludes coverage for a vehicle, other than the covered auto, which is “furnished or available for the regular use of any family member” of the named insured.

Eugene McDonald was seriously injured as a result of a collision between the vehicle which he was operating and a vehicle operated by Phillip Ellis. The vehicle being operated by Ellis was owned by his grandparents, Arlie and Dora Robson; it was insured under a policy issued by Travelers Corporation. At…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  2. Central Security Mutual Insurance v. DePintoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Kenilworth Insurance Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Brien Volpe v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutl Ins Co v. James SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. American States Insurance v. TannerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Brink v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API