Legal Opinion

Power Co. v. . Haywood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A jury trial was waived, and the facts and the law were submitted to, and passed upon by, the court.

The plaintiff alleges that it is the sole owner of the land in controversy, and the defendants make denial and allege that they should be let into possession as tenants in common with the plaintiff. The purpose of the action is to remove a cloud from the plaintiff's alleged title.

The facts are as follows:

1. That William Boylan, late of Wake County, died in said county on 16 July, 1861, seized and possessed of a large estate, including the lands described in the complaint.

2. That the said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Early v. Early.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Devane v. . LarkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  4. Lawrence v. . PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
  5. Brinson v. . WhartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chas. W. Priddy & Co. v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Strickland v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Bland v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API