Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. Rugg, Admx.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1931No. 22752PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question presented is, Shall the widow be deemed to have elected to take under the will, or may the court enter an election most favorable to her interests, and order distribution accordingly?

It is conceded that the rights and interests of the widow in the estate of the decedent are greater and more valuable under the law than under the will of the testator, but'it is contended that the provisions of Section 10571, General Code, are conclusive of the question here presented, and that, no election having been made by the widow within the time therein prescribed, she is deemed to have taken…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Steenwyck v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Manhattan Life Ins. v. WarwickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1871
  3. Andrews v. BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Kennedy v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Spruance v. DarlingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Colvin v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Vanderlinde v. Bankers Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re Estate of KnoflerOhio Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API