Legal Opinion

People's Party of Connecticut v. Dawson

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 1, 1948No. File 78161Published

1Opinion of the CourtQuinlan, J.

This proceeding seeks for its basic relief a declaratory judgment. The action itself was returnable to court the first Tuesday in September. The prayer for an injunction is in aid of the declaratory judgment. The immediate motion is for a temporary injunction. An injunction does not lie as a matter of right but in the sound discretion of the trier; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Carey, 80 Conn. 426; Point O’ Woods Assn., Inc. v. Busher, 117 Conn. 247, 250; is not granted to prevent an act possibly injurious in the future; Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v. Connecticut River Co., 7 Conn. 28, 50; and is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Company for Erecting & Supporting a Toll Bridge v. Connecticut River Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  4. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Goodwin v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API