Legal Opinion

Davidson & Company, Limited v. Allen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1973No. 6928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

This action was instituted by Davidson & Company, Limited, a Canadian brokerage firm, against the Allens to recover $12,604.23 allegedly due upon a default judment for that amount entered by a court of general jurisdiction in British Columbia, Canada. Our district court found that the Canadian court lacked jurisdiction to render a valid in personam judgment against the Allens. Accordingly, it entered summary judgment for the defendants, from which this appeal is taken.

Stating the facts most to the advantage of Davidson & Company, as we are bound to do…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Efectos Litográficos, C. A. v. National Paper & Type Co. of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
  2. Bank of Montreal v. KoughDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
  3. McDermond v. SiemensNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kwongyuen Hangkee Co. v. Starr Fireworks, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Benetti v. KishnerNevada Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API