Legal Opinion

People v. Damien V.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2008No. G038495PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*19Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Defendant Damien V., then 17 years of age, was alleged to have committed an act of gang-related vandalism. Defendant demurred to the petition, arguing Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (d), which provides an alternate penalty provision when the underlying offense is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang, only applies to adult offenders, not juveniles. (All further statutory references are to the Penal Code, unless otherwise noted.) The juvenile court overruled the demurrer; defendant admitted the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. BrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. D.Y. (In re D.Y.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Solano v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. In Re DamienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Angela C. Martinez, et al. v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API