Legal Opinion · Concurrence

George Garcia v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2015No. 11-73406Published

1ConcurrenceBerzon, Circuit Judge

I join, the per curiam opinion, as I entirely agree that George Camacho Garcia’s appeal waiver was invalid because his conviction was not an aggravated felony. I *797write separately to explain an additional, more fundamental problem with the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) decisions in this case: In my view, the regulation upon which the BIA relied for its conclusion that it lacked jurisdiction is flatly inconsistent with the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”).

Routinely, when an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) renders a decision, he asks the respondent and the Department of Homeland Security…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Castro v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Narine v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Coyt v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API