Legal Opinion
Allen v. Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 1, 2017No. 16-3316UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
Gregory A. Phillips, Circuit Judge
Mike Allen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his application for supplemental security income. Exercising jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Allen alleged in his application that as of October 9, 2013, he was disabled due to a back injury. His claim was ultimately denied by an administrative law judge (ALJ) at steps four and five of the five-step sequential evaluation process set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4). The ALJ found that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- White v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Poppa v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Threet v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Barnett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sanders v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020