Legal Opinion
Kruse v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 10, 2004No. 03-7665PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge.
In a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the plaintiffs allege that certain billing practices of the defendant home-mortgage providers with respect to their provision of real estate settlement services to the plaintiffs were contrary to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (“RESPA”), in particular RESPA § 8(b) (codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2607(b)). RESPA § 8(b) provides:
No person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split, or percentage of any charge made or received for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United Airlines, Inc. v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Friedman v. Market Street Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Mims v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Santiago v. GMAC Mortgage Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.