Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Rusconi

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 21, 1992No. Civ. 91-0043-P-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

This case arose out of Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) 1 seeking foreclosure of realty owned by Patricia and Angelo Rusconi (“Defendants”), which was provided as collateral for a note dated October 2, 1987 (“First Note”), in the principal amount of $150,000. Defendants had executed, acknowledged, and delivered to BNE a Mortgage and Security Agreement (“Mortgage”) covering personal realty located at Lake Thompson, Maine. Plaintiff seeks…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re Scott)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Updike Bros.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1993
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. RusconiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992
  4. Mansolillo v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. LaskinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API