Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Rusconi
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 21, 1992No. Civ. 91-0043-P-CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT — ON RECONSIDERATION 1
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.
This case arose out of Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) 2 seeking foreclosure of realty owned by Patricia and Angelo Ruseoni (“Defendants”), which was provided as collateral for a note dated October 2, 1987 (“First Note”), in the principal amount of $150,000. Defendants had executed, acknowledged, and delivered to BNE a Mortgage and Security Agreement (“Mortgage”) covering…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Morris v. AzziDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Gustin v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
- In Re Miraj and Sons, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.