Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Little Rock North Heights Water District No. 18

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 14, 1935No. 4-4123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

The Little Rock North Heights Water District No. 18 desired to refund its indebtedness under act No. 192 of the Acts of 1935, and, among other things preparatory thereto, it entered into a contract with C. W. Simpson, whereby he surrendered two certain bonds he held, Nos. 68 and 69, and agreed to receive other bonds of a new issue in lieu thereof. The improvement district, on account of delinquencies in the payment of assessments, was in default, and was preparing to issue new bonds, under said act 192, refunding the unpaid portion of its indebtedness, the said new bonds to draw interest at 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Talkington v. TurnbowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Oliphint v. EckerleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  3. Atkinson v. Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Alphin v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coleman's Service Center, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Royce LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Bank of Kremlin v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. In Re MancleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API