Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Putney

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 2010No. A10A1054PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Following a bench trial in a dispute over Gary Abrams’s failure to pay his former attorney’s (Martin Putney) fees, the trial court entered a judgment against Abrams and in favor of Putney. Abrams appeals, contending that the trial court erred by awarding excessive fees to Putney and to Putney’s counsel (who represented Putney in the fee dispute), and by excluding some of Abrams’s testimony as hearsay. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

“On appeal from a bench trial, we construe the evidence in favor of the judgment and will not disturb fact findings of a trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doe v. HGI Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Hardnett v. OgundeleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Johnson Real Estate Investments, LLC v. Aqua Industrials, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Padilla v. PadillaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Bowen Builders Group, Inc. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Manitou Constraction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  2. Hal Wright, Esq., P.C. v. GentemannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Hal Wright, Esq., P. C. v. Gerald GentemannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API