Legal Opinion

Hal Wright, Esq., P.C. v. Gentemann

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 2014No. A14A0341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Hal Wright, Esq., P.C. (the “PC.”), the professional corporation for the law practice of Howell Franklin Wright, filed an action against Gerald Gentemann in the trial court to collect an unpaid invoice for attorney fees under a contract for legal services. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered a judgment for the P.C. in the amount of $19,715.70, which included an award of attorney fees and expenses the P.C. incurred in retaining outside counsel to represent it in the action. The PC. appeals, arguing that the trial court also should have awarded it attorney…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Cellular Telecom v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Cason v. CasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Sprewell v. Thompson & Hutson, South Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Lowe v. Center Neurology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Summit at Scarborough Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Summit at Scarborough Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Ltanya H. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API