Marcus v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Jon Marcus claims he is the target of a politically motivated investigation by the United States Attorney General into alleged federal campaign finance violations. He brought suit against the Attorney General and the Federal Election Commission Chairman seeking a declaration that the Attorney General’s investigation is unlawful. His claim boils down to this: the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, 86 Stat. 11, as amended, 2 U.S.C. §§ 431-455, prohibits the Attorney General from investigating or prosecuting suspected criminal violations of the Act unless the FEC has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, and Russell E. JoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fieger v. United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Bialek v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCormack v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Daniels v. DonahoeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Blomdahl 340267 v. JaffeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Danam v. Arizona Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Lowthorp v. Mesa Air Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.