Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2009No. 08-15643PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Jon Marcus claims he is the target of a politically motivated investigation by the United States Attorney General into alleged federal campaign finance violations. He brought suit against the Attorney General and the Federal Election Commission Chairman seeking a declaration that the Attorney General’s investigation is unlawful. His claim boils down to this: the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, 86 Stat. 11, as amended, 2 U.S.C. §§ 431-455, prohibits the Attorney General from investigating or prosecuting suspected criminal violations of the Act unless the FEC has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, and Russell E. JoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Fieger v. United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Bialek v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCormack v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  2. Daniels v. DonahoeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  3. Blomdahl 340267 v. JaffeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Danam v. Arizona Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Lowthorp v. Mesa Air Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API