United States v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, and Russell E. Joy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were indicted for violating the Federal Election Campaign Act, 2 U.S.C. §§ 431-456 (1976) 1 11. The district court dismissed the indictment on the ground that the Attorney General had failed to exhaust the administrative remedy before the Federal Election Commission (FEC), available under section 437g of the Act, before seeking an indictment. We conclude Congress did not intend to impose this limitation upon the power of the Attorney General to enforce the law. We therefore reverse.
The administrative remedy was added to the statute by amendments adopted in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Palumbo Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- United States v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- United States v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.