Legal Opinion
McCormack v. City and County of Honolulu
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 25, 2011No. Civil 10-00293 SOM/KSCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
On May 18, 2010, Plaintiff Michael S. McCormack filed this action against the City and County of Honolulu (“City”), Honolulu Police Department Officer Andy Lazano (“Lazano”), and Officer Pacheco (“Pacheco”). The gravamen of this action is that Officers Lazano and Pacheco allegedly used excessive force in falsely arresting McCormack, causing him to suffer a seizure. The Complaint alleges violations of McCormack’s constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- (PC) Agustin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
- Cadiente v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
- Hollandsworth v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Kam v. HelmDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Lerette v. City and County of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.