Legal Opinion

People v. Crossland

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1960No. Crim. 3756PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Defendant was charged with being a person convicted of felony who was in possession of a gun capable of concealment on the person (Pen. Code, § 12021). He appeals from judgment of conviction entered upon jury verdict. The sole claim of error is that the trial judge, in comments made to the jury after its deliberation had begun, unduly influenced the jury’s verdict.

The jury retired at 1:50 p. m. of the second day of trial. It returned three times for reading of evidence and for further instructions. At 9 :38 p. m., the court again had the jurors returned to the courtroom, and was told that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. ConboyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. People v. KindlebergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. BaumgartnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. OzeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API