Legal Opinion

People v. Pineda

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1965No. Crim. 4920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

In this appeal from a conviction for illegal possession of heroin, appellant’s two points are: (1) that the judge coerced the jury, and (2) that there was error in the sentencing. There is no challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

Officers armed with a search warrant entered a room which was occupied by appellant, appellant’s brother Charles, and Joe Gracia. Charles was under the influence of a narcotic. Gracia had been convicted of possession of narcotics previously. One of the officers testified that he saw an envelope in the hand of appellant and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. ConboyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. ThatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Grasso v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API