Stribling's Nurseries, Inc. v. County of Merced
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Plaintiff nursery filed an action to recover from defendant County of Merced taxes on nursery stock paid under protest, and received a judgment in the court below. The claim is based upon Agricultural Code section 30.3, which reads as follows: “Inasmuch as the planned production of trees, vines, rose bushes, ornamental plants and other horticultural crops is distinguishable from the production of other products of the soil only in relation to the time elapsing before maturity, plants being produced by nurseries shall be considered to be ‘growing agricultural crops’ for the purpose of any laws…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Pasadena University v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cottle v. SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Misasi v. W. C. JacobsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- El Tejon Cattle Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Cristmat, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- California Correctional Officers' Ass'n v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Nunes Turfgrass, Inc. v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980