Legal Opinion

Flye v. Hall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C. J.

This is an action of tort or contract. The declaration as amended contains three counts, one for the conversion of money, the second for money had and received, and the third on an account annexed, all being for the same cause of action. The first and second counts in substance aver that the plaintiff’s intestate during her life handed to the defendant various sums of money to be used for the support of the plaintiff’s intestate, the defendant’s mother, and that a part only had been used for that purpose.

/The defendant demurred to the declaration on various grounds. In support of the demurrer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spear v. CogganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Devlin v. HoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Brown v. SallingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  2. Grueninger v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Mitchell Woodbury Corp. v. Albert Pick Barth Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  4. Brown v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Gallagher v. R. E. Cunniff, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API