Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided March 28, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear House of Representatives Roberts,

¶ 0 This office has received your letter asking for an official Opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:

1. What is the proper interpretation of the phrase "the thenexisting rights" of a member contained in 74 O.S.Supp. 1995, §923(A) with respect to the ability of the Legislature to modifycomponents of the retirement benefits of the Oklahoma PublicEmployees Retirement System insofar as any particular member isconcerned? 2. a. Does 74 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 923(A) affirmativelyestablish that members of the Oklahoma Public EmployeesRetirement…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Singer v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API