International Ry. Co. v. Prendergast
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This bill, in equity, seeks to enjoin an enforcement of state statutes and orders of the publie service commission of the state o£ New York> refiuirinS tke plaintiff to operate its street railway at certain maximum rates of fare. The basis of the right to relief is that the rates of fare are inadequate, and, if enforced, would be confiscatory of *295the plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff filed a tariff fixing fares, and the public service commission refused, by the orders in question, to permit them to become effective. Its position is that the rate of return upon the fares now…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Ry. Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- Georgia Continental Telephone Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1934