Legal Opinion
International Ry. Co. v. Prendergast
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff moves for a confirmation of the master’s report in this suit seeking relief from a claimed confiscation of its street railway property by reason of the rate of fare it is permitted to charge for carrying passengers in the eity of Buffalo. It is a street railway corporation organized under the New York state law, subject to the supervision and regulation of the Public Service Commission (chapter 480, Laws of 1910 (Consol. Laws N. Y. e. 48) amending chapter 429' of the Laws of 1907). It operated a street railway system in the cities of Buffalo, Niagara Falls,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- American Toll Bridge Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mtr. of City of Ny (5th Ave. Coach Lines)New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Dade County v. General Waterworks Corp., Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.