Legal Opinion

Kennemer-Willis Grocery Co. v. Hacker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 8 Div. 368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

There is here no question about the general rule that a corporation, without charter power, express or implied, may not become an accommodation indorser, surety, or guarantor for another. That is conceded. But we are concerned with the inquiry as to when, without express charter power, there is such implied, and whether the facts show an accommodation indorsement (or suretyship) rather than a primary liability, when the controversy is with the payee and not between the debtors among themselves. It is well, here, we think, to refer to principles asserted by the courts and text-writers on that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Citizens' Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Sherwood v. AlvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Page Trust Co. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Chewacla Lime Works v. Dismukes, Frierson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freimuth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. F & M Building Partnership v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Howell v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API