Legal Opinion

People v. Chilcott

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1937No. Crim. 409PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The defendant was accused by information with having committed the crime of murder. On arraignment he entered a plea of not guilty and was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict finding him guilty of the crime of manslaughter. Thereafter, the trial court pronounced judgment whereby it was ordered that he be confined in the state prison as punishment for the offense of which he was convicted. From the judgment thus rendered defendant presents this appeal.

Appellant advances two contentions in his effort to secure a reversal of the judgment. The first of these is that he was deprived of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. People v. PodwysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. IsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. SampsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. HidalgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API