Legal Opinion

People v. Hidalgo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1947No. Crim. No. 2438PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appeal from .judgment of conviction for violation of section 261 of the Penal Code and section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and from the order denying the motion for new trial.

Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury, but bases his appeal on two grounds: (1) Alleged error by the court in omitting two of defendant’s proposed instructions; and (2) alleged misconduct of the prosecuting attorney.

The information charged defendant with violating section 261 of the Penal Code by an act of sexual intercourse with Johanna Nellen, a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. StullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API