State v. Pierce
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C. J.
¶1 When a person in custody unequivocally requests a lawyer, police are obligated under CrR 3.1(c)(2) to make all reasonable efforts to put that person in contact with a lawyer at the earliest opportunity. The remedy for violating this rule is suppression of the evidence tainted by the violation. Furthermore, prosecutors have a duty to secure a verdict free of prejudice and based on reason. A prosecutor’s appeal to the jury’s passion and prejudice violates this duty.
¶2 Pat and Janice Yarr were murdered, and their house was burned down. While the house was still burning, Michael Pierce’s image…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. ScherfWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Dawn Marie Sullivan, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- People of Guam v. Jordan Saul RachulapSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
- State Of Washington v. Jeremiah TeasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.