Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 28, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These two proceedings arise out of the discipline, hereafter described, of the plaintiff in the first case, Reilly, and his later discharge on September 26, 1972, by a codefendant in the first case, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). In that case, a bill in equity brought August 3, 1973, Reilly sought to compel Local 589 (Union) “to arbitrate in good faith” his grievances against the MBTA and to require the MBTA to arbitrate them. The second proceeding, a complaint filed May 8, 1981, by the MBTA against the officers of the Union, sought (see part II of this opinion) to hold…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Bowen v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leahy v. Local 1526, American Federation of State, County, & Municipal EmployeesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Winthrop Corp. v. LowenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Sansone v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Best v. RomeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  5. Pattison v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API