Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Northside Residents Redevelopment Council
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 9, 1991No. C1-90-2115PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court denied summary judgment motions by appellant Van F. White and the City of Minneapolis. White claimed official immunity and the city claimed statutory immunity. Interlocutory appeal was taken pursuant to Anderson v. City of Hopkins, 393 N.W.2d 363 (Minn.1986). We affirm denial of the City of Minneapolis’s alleged statutory immunity and conclude denial of Van White’s motion is not presently appealable.
FACTS
Respondents Thomas H. Johnson, M.D. and his son Thomas H. Johnson, III decided to sell land and buildings they had used to operate the Plymouth Avenue…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGovern v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public DefenseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Masonick v. J.P. Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Masonick v. J.P. Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Zutz v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.