Killelea v. California Horseshoe Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from k judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the eourf
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The appellant during all the time mentioned in the complaint was engaged in operating a factory for the manufacture of horseshoes; and on October 21, 1890, respondent was, and for more than a year immediately preceding that had been, in the employ of appellant at its factory. Respondent was employed to operate a punching-machine, by which nail-holes were made in the horseshoes, receiving as compensation for his work a certain sum of money for every hundred shoes…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by16 opinions
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Keena v. United RailRoads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.