Legal Opinion

United States v. Friedman

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided June 1, 1915No. 319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Benjamin Friedman was indicted for violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Raw.

1Opinion of the Court

McCALL, District Judge.

The indictment in this case charges the defendant with having dispensed, distributed, and prescribed gum opium and powdered opium, the derivatives, compounds, and preparations thereof, to wit, morphine sulphate, heroin, and cocaine, a deriva*277tive of coca leaves, without the dispensing, distribution, and prescription as aforesaid being in the course of his professional practice; that is to say, that he dispensed, distributed, and prescribed the aforesaid drugs in quantities more, than zras necessary to meet the immediate needs of a patient, and did not distribute,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CarneyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1915
  2. United States v. KatzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. United States v. CurtisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
  4. United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  5. United States v. DoremusDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API