Legal Opinion

United States v. Doremus

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 2, 1918No. 2254PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Charles T. Doremus was charged with unlawfully dealing in narcotics in violation of Act Dec. 17, 1914. Hearing on demurrer to indictment in style motion to quash.

1Opinion of the Court

WEST, District Judge.

Omitting formal parts, the first and second counts of the indictment are substantially as follows:

First Count: “That heretofore, to wit, on or about the 11th day of March, A. II. 1015, at the city of San Antonio, Western District, of Texas, and the San Antonio division thereof, one C. T. Doremus, a physician, who had duly registered, and who had paid the special tax as required by the act of Congress approved December 17, 1014, entitled ‘An act to provide for the registration of, with the collectors of internal revenue, and to impose a special lax upon all persons who…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. In Re KollockSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  2. United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  3. United States v. DenkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API