Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtis

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided February 7, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Frederick W. Curtis was indicted for alleged violations of the act of Congress approved December 17, 1914, and known as the “Harrison Narcotic Daw.” On demurrer to the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

The indictment was found and filed January 10, 1916, and contains two counts. The first count charges that Frederick W. Curtis on or about the 2d day of March, 1915, at the city of Troy, Northern district of New York, in violation of the provisions of section 1 of the act of December 17, 1914, and the acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto*,

“did unlawfully, wrongfully, and knowingly sell, dispense, and distribute to Mrs. .T. McCullough 100 quarter-grain tablets of morphine sulphate, the said morphine sulphate tablets being a compound, manufacture;salt,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1915
  2. United States v. FriedmanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indiana Board of Pharmacy v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. United States v. Direct Sales Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942
  3. United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  4. United States v. DoremusDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API